Archived - Reducing the Administrative Burden on First Nations

Archived information

This Web page has been archived on the Web. Archived information is provided for reference, research or record keeping purposes. It is not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards and has not been altered or updated since it was archived. Please contact us to request a format other than those available.

It has long been acknowledged that First Nations and other organizations that receive funding from the Government of Canada are caught in a complex web of reporting requirements, some of which are of dubious usefulness to them or to the organizations seeking the reports.

The roots of this reporting burden are deep. The proliferation of contribution programs from multiple departments, each pursuing its own agenda of how best to report to Parliament and Canadians for results achieved with the funds they manage, has led in turn to a proliferation of reporting. Some reporting is redundant but has not been dropped when new requirements arise.

These problems were highlighted in two key reports: the  2006 Independent Panel on Grants and Contributions (593 Kb, 142 pages), which tackles the issues for the whole of government, and the June 2011 report by the Office of the Auditor General on services to First Nations. The Government has taken action to respond to both of these reports.

The path to improvement involves three related tracks:

  1. Improving how grant and contribution programs work, by pruning reporting, consolidating programs, creating a challenge function to curb the instinct to ask for more data, and harmonizing processes across federal departments so the same data can serve many purposes;
  2. Differentiating among funding recipients so that those with stronger track records of financial and program management are rewarded with longer funding agreements and less reporting; and
  3. Shifting the accountability bargain away from reporting to government for the use of funds, toward accounting to communities and program clientele for results.

Progress Report by the Deputy Minister – November 29, 2012

On the first track AANDC has created an internal challenge function and reduced the number of ad-hoc reports from 4800 to 800.  Some of this involved removing duplication and consolidating multiple reports. Some of it involves asking for fewer data sets or asking for them less frequently.  Performance indicators in some key areas are being updated and information systems are being developed that make it much easier to share with recipients and partners. Then we can focus on reporting what is essential and of use to both the Department and those with whom we work. Two major initiatives we are working on are the Education Information Systems and the Child and Family Services Information System.

On the second track the Department has worked closely with First Nations financial specialists to develop a General Assessment (GA) tool to measure the track record and therefore the risk associated with each recipient. Recipients assessed as lower risk in turn receive fewer reporting requirements and longer term funding arrangements. These scores are shared with First Nations. A third cycle of GA is now under way.

The Department's core obligation is to account to Parliament and through it to Canadians for the financial resources with which it is entrusted. This inevitably leads to asking for financial accounting from funding recipients.

In 2012, the Minister announced measures that will standardize how recipients across Canada report on financial information. There will be one method for preparing audited financial statements, so comparisons from year to year and from community to community will be much easier.  And it will be easier for financial institutions and potential investors to do business with First Nations because information will be consistent and of high quality.

AANDC and Health Canada, who between them account for the vast majority of federal government funding to First Nations, are working to align their approach to grant and contribution agreements to eliminate many small differences that create additional work for recipients. The departments will take the same approach to risk assessment and funding agreements and by 2014 will share the same IT systems for both financial management, and for management of grants and contributions, making comprehensive reporting a reality.

Bill C-27, the proposed First Nations Financial Transparency Act, will require the posting of audited consolidated financial statements. This is the most important initiative on the third track because it is designed to empower community members to hold their elected leaders to account, shifting away from the old approach of only sending reports to the Department. 

The consistent transparent availability of financial statements can serve many purposes. The financial statement can soon become the core of an "Annual Report to the Community" that strengthens the democratic accountability of the First Nation government or institution. Many First Nations have already moved in this direction which will in turn allow for further reduction in reporting to federal departments.

To get to solutions that work, AANDC has worked closely with several First Nations on pilot projects to develop simpler reporting and shift toward accounting to the community. Five initiatives that have guided our efforts are with Abgeweit, Madawask Maliseet, Millbrook, Swan Lake and Wagmatook First Nations. 

Two projects that zero in on harmonizing reporting to multiple departments are an initiative with the Montagnais du Lac St.Jean (Masteuiatsch); and one with the Inuit community of Pangnirtung.  Both have already resulted in reduced numbers of reports and clearer accountability to members.

Other initiatives are underway to streamline administration of services. Bill C-45 will accelerate the implementation of some communities' decisions to designate land for leasing purposes.  The Department is engaged with many Western First Nations to give them decisions they can act quickly on and greater control of moneys held on their behalf by the Department.

The Department has also invested in ensuring there are other sources of transparent and reliable data for First Nations, and all Canadians, to assess for results. In May 2013, data from the 2011 Statistics Canada's National Household Survey will begin to flow, setting up the ability to measure progress over time, and to compare from one part of Canada to another.

As part of a deeper structural reform, the Government is moving to set out clear statutory frameworks in areas such as water and wastewater standards, and K to 12 education, directly responding to advice by the Auditor General in a number of key chapters in recent years.

In order for First Nations to realize a reduction in their reporting burden, the Government realizes it must remain diligent and refrain from asking for reports when the answers it seeks are available in the materials the First Nation prepares for its membership.

Progress Report by the Deputy Minister – March 6, 2014

Looking back at 2013 provides an opportunity to reflect on the work the Department has done in the past year to improve how grant and contribution programs work with a focus on reducing the administrative burden on our recipients.  First Nations, Tribal Councils, and Aboriginal Representative Organizations have all requested that AANDC improve its management of funding agreements. AANDC's funding recipients have requested simplified funding agreements, they would like to see them sooner each fiscal year, and they would like to discuss any changes the Department proposes to the administration of these agreements.

To respond to these requests, and to assist in meeting the desired outcome of the Crown-First Nations Gathering for a renewed relationship, a new optional streamlined funding agreement model is available to First Nations for the 2014-2015 fiscal year. The Department also made available the Plain/Simplified Funding Agreement Model for 2013-2014 for all project funding. AANDC worked collaboratively with Health Canada to offer a revised Canada Common Funding Agreement model to all interested low-risk recipients in 2014-2015.

In addition, the option of a longer-term (five-to-ten year) funding agreement is available for recipients that are assessed as very low-risk according to the department's risk assessment tool (General Assessment).

To further improve the efficiency and effectiveness of grant and contribution programs my Department has implemented service standards to support how we do business. AANDC is committed to posting the national funding agreement models and the reporting guide online by December 15 each year.  This will allow enough time for Departmental officials to discuss new fiscal year funding agreements with recipients, offer funding agreements for signature by March 1 for recipients with expiring agreements and issue payments by April 1 when the signed agreement is received by March 15.

On the reporting side, the Department has streamlined recipient reporting beginning in the 2014-2015 fiscal year consolidating the Year-End Reporting Handbook and the Recipient Reporting Guide into one tool called the Reporting Guide. The Reporting Guide gives reporting instructions for the financial and program performance aspects of their funding agreements with the Department.

To further streamline reporting, the Department has reviewed and reduced the number of Data Collection Instruments it uses to satisfy non-financial reporting requirements by 65% since 2012/13. Data Collection Instruments are tools the Department uses to collect data required for our program reporting.  Reducing them reduces our need to ask recipients for this data allowing them to focus their energy and resources on delivering programs and services to their membership. Of course examples are best used to paint a picture; the Huronne Wendat First Nation is required to submit 18 reports in 2013-14 as opposed to 32 in 2012-13. They also now have access to a ten year common funding agreement with Health Canada.

Looking at the work done to shift the accountability of First Nation elected officials away from reporting to government and toward reporting to their communities, on March 27, 2013, the First Nations Financial Transparency Act (FNFTA) received Royal Assent. The passage of this important legislation represents a milestone for greater accountability and transparency. The Act strengthens transparency and accountability by requiring First Nations to publish the annual audited consolidated financial statements they already prepare, as well as a Schedule of Remuneration and Expenses for Chiefs and Councillors. The accounting standards are in line with other levels of government in Canada. In fact, the model used for the audited consolidated financial statements was developed in accordance with the Public Sector Accounting Board Standards and Guidelines to assist First Nations and Aboriginal organizations to provide consistent, comparable financial information to their members. Under the Act, First Nations will be required to publish the first of their annual audited consolidated financial statements and Schedule of Remuneration and Expenses for Chiefs and Councillors by July 29, 2014. In fact, many First Nation governments are leading the way and publish financial information online and some already provide detailed reports to their communities.

In 2014-15, AANDC will assess the lessons learned from a pilot begun in 2012 in order to develop a template for an Annual Report to the community. The Annual Report will combine performance and financial information that can be used by First Nations to report to their members and to the Department.  Combined with financial information in the Audited Consolidated Financial Statements required by the Financial Transparency Act, the Annual Report will provide a comprehensive and performance-oriented complementary picture of how resources were used and what results were achieved with those resources in the community.

Did you find what you were looking for?

What was wrong?

You will not receive a reply. Don't include personal information (telephone, email, SIN, financial, medical, or work details).
Maximum 300 characters

Thank you for your feedback

Date modified: